Idealistic Politics Essay

The history of entirely hitherto existing gild is the history of class struggles, tell Karl Marx, who is considered to be unitary of the worlds most seminal thinkers. Marx categorized these classes in devil broad categories the middle class versus the proletariats, the upper class opposed to the land class and the caste that suck in access to the factors of production against everybody else who ar compelled to lot their labor. In policy-making terms the bourgeois were the committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie (Marx, 20) and in parliamentary law to reduce any friction, latent hostility or resistance towards their supremacy they then laid down a set of saints and values for alone classes and citizens. The ultimate goal of having a vapid set of principles was to disintegrate existing precedents and values by instigating the proletariats to fully give the bourgeois set of principles by suspending their own. History, however, has yet to se e much(prenominal)(prenominal) an expiration where the bourgeois triumph in instigating such circumstances successfully.What bumps in such circumstances instead is a conflict due(p) to inconsistency that guides amidst the dogmas of both classes whereby the reality base ideals of the proletariats clashes with the idealistic values of the bourgeoisie. These conflicts in produce affect the policy-making ideologies and actions since the political sympathies is the argonna where the battle of principles occurs, primarily due to two reasons. The first existence that these conflicts leave non surface in the first place except in the political arena due to the austere nature and secondly the outcomes will not be original unless at a take were they are made public and irreversible. turn out of these conflicts exists in our texts and films, however in differing contexts.In Antigone, Creon represents the bourgeoisie and Antigone the proletariats in A deal on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences the liberal humanities and sciences were the debase vales instigated by the intellectuals whilst the savage being was the unlearned and nave proletariat, and finally in Marxs Communist Manifesto where the distinctions are extremely clear among the two classes. In the course of my paper I craving to examine the efficacy and weakness of each of these ideal societies and their implications to political political theory and action.The values of Karl Marxs idealist communist society may be summed up in the single sentence Abolition of private berth (Marx, 34). He believed that one time private ownership was abolished mass would change, and this would finally end the history of all class struggles. Communism to Marx was an extension or a sensitiver form of favorableism, whereby the people owned everything and everybody worked for the carcass, hence no form of personal interests was vested in the system. This surmisal was made by placing a gamble on hu man manner, probably the most unpredictable factor to place whatsoever form of stakes on. Marx was assuming that among a whole class of people no interests were develop and apart from those of the proletariat as a whole (Marx, 33). The society that Marx envisioned was one where all the citizens desired only the interests of the society by not desiring to satisfy their personal interests.History, however, does not have a basis for pure communism where a group of people have ceased to exist without any possessions and have lived only by the idea the closest simile one could give would be of hunter-gatherer societies. These societies, however, existed during the prehistoric times where human attitudes and behaviours were not being constantly reshaped by the changing economic systems in which people maintain themselves nowadays, which Marx himself mentions as there being no such thing as fixed human nature. Therefore, communism could never work be puddle it goes against human na ture. flock are ingrainedly much competitive than cooperative. Moreover, the possibility for alteration to occur where the bourgeoisie were to come down in their mixer status to the level of the proletariats and the proletariats rise to eminence of the bourgeoisies could only occur if human nature were to be dismantled, self memories be wiped out and in other words for the revolution to occur successfully in needs to be self induced.Marx in an indirect manner implies how ones self worth has lessen with the current system when he discusses the dynamics of profit task and whether it creates property for the laborer. He states that the system is self-defeating for the laborers, which outhousenot increase except upon shape of begetting a new supply of wage-laborer for fresh exploitation (Marx 34). If we were to refer back to the analogy hunter-gatherer societies the fruits of ones labour were immediate when an individualist hunted his reinforce was immediate and did not wait for his fruits or live only in so far as the interest of the ruling class requires it (Marx. 35). In short mans worth and dignity has been demoralized and every individual has been converted in paid wage laborersand has reduced relation backss to a mere money relations (Marx, 21).Individuals were not bounded by the social status hunter-gatherer since everyone shared and everyone knew their worth. The advantage of this system is that it does not create any direction for friction to occur because it does not include the idea of individuals desiring to wish to control the environment or vest any personal interests into the system. This can primarily be attributed to the value the system advocates of not wishing to enjoin people under any circumstances the system does not realise race, ethnicity and differences of age and sex no longer have any distinctive social validity (Marx, 26), a trait of hunter-gatherer societies, which Marx so dearly desires.These values would in turn affect the political ideologies of a system trying to natural covering to communism by picking on the one essential condition for the existenceof the bourgeois class, the formation and the augmentation of capital the condition for capital is wage labour (Marx, 32). Therefore, the conflicts that would arise would be those that regarding wage labour and its supply the bourgeoisie would advocate any action that would enhance the competition betwixt laborers the make behind keeping a unremitting supply of wage labour opposed to the proletariats immediate aim of cutting onward this supply and by doing so ensuring its immediate aim of overthrowing the bourgeois supremacy. each decline in wage labour would threaten the bourgeoisies capital by reducing its turnover, hence weakening their foothold in the marketplace in turn inhibiting their ability to constantly revolutionize the instruments of production in order to exist and survive (Marx, 21).The bourgeoisie quest to seek a continuous wage labour would see a shift in their political ideology they would seek to manipulate cities, provinces and other nations that are weak cause them to become dependent on them. The consequence of such political centralization would cart track to the epidemic of overproduction, whereby the only manner in which the crises can be overcome is by the conquest of new markets, and by the and by the much than through exploitation of the old ones (Marx, 25).However, such exploitation of markets can occur only to a certain limit, until other nations impose regulations confiding the system to resort to desperate measures and turmoil, which occurred with China. Chinese products flooded the world market until tardily and now they have been rejected entry into the World Trade presidency (WTO) and do not enjoy the benefits of free trade. Therefore, China have use enforced destruction of a mass of productive forces (Marx, 25) to decrease their output, which has lead to a lot of turmoil inside th e country with dogmas of the government political stability and international recognition and the working class subsistence and a transgress life clashing against each other further depressing the situation. wish well Karl Marx, J.J. Rousseau also painted a picture of ideal society. In his Discourse on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences he condemns how societies have succumbed to humanities and sciences that have molded our behavior, and taught our passions to speak an artificial language (Rousseau, 6) with the desire to enrapture one another with performances worthy of their mutual approbation (Rousseau, 4). He believed that individuals were detain in the values and ideals of society that the arts and sciences saturationened, whereby everyone followed and nobody dared to be prompted by their inner selves in order not be seen as outcasts, resulting in man losing his individuality.In a nutshell, Rousseau believed that the arts and sciences had tainted origins and th ey reinforced our crimes by fostering our desire for comfort by transforming individuals into sugar coated pills, whereby jealousy, suspicion, fear, coldness, reserve, abominate and fraud lie constantly concealed under the uniform and delusive veil of politeness (Rousseau, 7). He in turn pictured a society were he believed man was innately pious was not quiet by societys decorum therefore abandoning the possibilities o the vices that sprout in modern societies are nonexistent. He understood virtue in terms of bravery, courage and strength in other words he saw it in raw military power.The weaknesses in Rousseaus house painting of the ideal society are the assumptions that are embedded in the incertitude that he was addressing Whether the restoration of the arts and sciences has had the effect of purifying or change morals? Rousseau has to assume that there has been a revival in the arts as well as assume a relationship between abstract and applied knowledge with morality tha t being the human behavior and customs a society embraces. Such assumptions lead Rousseau to base his parentage on a set of contradictions. He idealized the values of the Persians, Germans and Spartans who had an out-of-the-way social structure where there was no study of abstract education, no accumulation of property and military virtues were emphasized. The idealizations of such societies contradicted his resentment for etiquette or what he referred to as the veil of politeness, since there exists no organization whereby more discipline, etiquette or order to our rude but natural morals is undeniable than military organizations.Throughout the discourse the theme of man becoming dismay once he enters society and losing his individuality because they all act the selfsame(prenominal) under the same circumstances a comparable (Rousseau, 6) is repeatedly emphasized. This argument in itself is self-defeating because if it is the grouping of people that induces people to conceal th emselves and live among uncertainty, Rousseaus ideal society would truly only berth for isolated individuals since such a level of purity could not occur in the natural dynamics of human societies. When individuals interact, the views and ideals of others will indeed affect the way the individual will live his life, since it is part of human nature to conform to the rules and regulations of others, which are a collection of ideals and values that compromise the principles of society.For a society to function in harmony there has to be some common fuze whereby all the different members of that society must conform to and must abandon some of their individual ideals for the betterment of the society. Rousseau argues that man would not have to commit his own ideals if he was not placed in the blasphemies of modern societies since he assumes humans are rightfully good and everyone would approve of the actions of others. This in itself breaks Rousseaus argument since there is exists no yardstick to measure good and eve if there were to exist such a measure, differences on which good is stamp down would in turn cause conflicts.The simplicity of the society Rousseau describes is its initial strength the simpler ones life, the palette on which he is to express his bad perspectives becomes less like the American savageswho live entirely on the products of the chaseand yoke, indeed, cannot be impose on men who stand in need of nothing (Rousseau,5). In a society where the needs do not exceed the elementary physiological, safety and social needs and are readily satisfied the room for subversive activity becomes minimal. Therefore, I believe Rousseaus attack on the arts and sciences is not so much on their origins or sources but more so on how it manages to widen our needs to include self-actualization and self-realization needs, which are needs that are satisfied by luxuries and how we appear in relation to the people surrounding us a need where the veil and cor ruption required to have those needs satisfied.Rousseaus painting of such an ideal society would not require a political system, however if all his assumptions were suspended the political implications would be drastic. In politics rarely is something said literally and in a society where the members innately believe that everyone is sincerely good, would not be capable of reading between the lines and would end up in turmoil since other nations would manipulate their naivety. Furthermore, in a society where abstract knowledge such a geometry and economics is not taught the politicians will be unable(predicate) of drawing upon actions that will be favour their society, since politics is the evil of all sciences and without a good base in its basal terminology that being the abstract sciences one will be incapable of mastering it and using it to his advantage.Speak from their heartoffend someone.do not take careIn Antigone the Greek tragedy, morals, egos, and gender issues were th e epics around which principles were based upon.Follow one manHarun Al Rashid..Mamluks..they use to be all loyalLower class has less say in the political era in order to stop the formation of proletariats which is so measurable for the revolution to occur.Political laws that protect private propertyEnhance engagement (p.21)Dependence of poor countries on rich (.23)Eradicate opposition nowStrength of prletarits p.28 trade unionsp.32 existence remains on capital1) Basecaus they locate down ideals that seem utopian only to them, they forget2) Might have noticed that there are more cons than prosSeveral of our texts paint images of ideal human society. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these imagined societies. How do these imagined ideal societies interact with political ideology and political action.BibliographyMarx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto. cutting York Bantam, 1992.Sophocles. The Three Theban Plays Antigone, Oedipus The King, Oedipus at Colonus. Trans. RobertFagles. New York Penguin, 1977.Communism Could Never work Because it goes against human nature. People are of course more competitive than cooperative. http//www.wsu.edu/brians/hum_303/nature.html