Comparing Millers Enemy of the People, Becketts Waiting for Godot and Vonneguts Slaughterhouse-F :: comparison compare contrast essays

Human set and Technology in Millers resistance of the People, Becketts Waiting for Godot and Vonneguts Slaughterhouse-Five Human values cant be replaced by technology. Human values can just hope to learn as quickly as technology is expanding. If one lags behind the other, its mankind values. Technology can exist and function without human values. There is a rush for Isaac Newton but that doesnt negate the understand aim for a sizeable philosopher. Though both technology and human values can be used hand in hand and that is the ideal situation. Too oft of anything is a bad thing. Its all about finding a balance. Enemy of the People is the perfect example of how human values sometimes dont burgeon forth as quickly as technology. The town had the technology available to get down sure the hot springs were up to par but not solely did they not put that technology to use but they challenged the findings with no demonstration of their own. The town as a whole had no exp erience with this lawsuit of science before. Thus, they were instantly skeptical (they also benefited financially by not believing it). But what the town should have done was step punt and look at all the facts (sick visitors (Miller 35) and the low intake (Miller 36)) and made an inform decision instead of just running from the unknown. They happen to have mightiness and intimacy, (Miller 45) is what Dr. Stockman told Hovstad. He assumed that these people had the same trust and knowledge in technology that he had but he was wrong. People need a way to deal with the ever-growing new technology. It was scary for the town to conceptualize that there were things happening on the bacterial level (one that they couldnt see). Did the town exact not to believe the blatant truth because it would hurt them, the skewed facts or out of fear of the unknown and the consequences. Ignorance is bliss, but civilization needs to be informed of whats going on and how it affects their li ves. A person cant just take things on faith when dealing with science, they need proof and an explanation. Its easy to look out the mass in anything (especially public opinion) but one needs to use up themselves how informed is the general public?