Descartes, Leibniz, And Spinoza Essay -- essays research papers

If these great thinkers (Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz) were to discuss instead the mortals connection to the body, what might each say (both on his witness behalf and in response to the other)? Would they find any places where they might agree? If non, why not? (These are, after all, smart guys)Though this sort of meeting would sweetheart me as a debate with as furiously disparate and harsh ideals as one would find in a meeting of Andrew Weil, Jerry Falwell, and David Duke, I expect that the philosophers would find some surprisingly common ground. Descartes, the Christian outcast, Spinoza, the Jewish outcast, and Leibniz, the creative mathematician all acknowledge that what we know better than anything is the wit. Given this, we tush deduce that any knowledge we acquire of our perceived bodies does not necessarily relate to some external reality, physical substance, or biological bodies. However, from this apex on the three scholars meander off in separate explicit argum ents.Descartes reasons in Meditations on the First Philosophy In Which the Existence of immortal and the Distinction Between Mind and Body are Demonstrated that mind and body are real, extant, and separate products of God. He does this by suggesting that if the body were not real, then God would be deceiving us, which is unlikely from a perfect god. He also arrives at a proof for his minds humans by postulating the famous cogito, ...