'Level of processing' model of memory Math Problem

direct of processing mildew of memory - Math Problem ExampleEysenck time-tested this model to see if it could explain reported differences between new(a) and old people in their ability to draw off verbal material. Eysenck predicted that there would be an interaction between age and fall condition, more specifically that young participants would fall more words when using deeper levels of processing.30 subjects between 55 and 65 years of age, and 30 subjects between 18 and 30 years of age were allocated to one of three groups - two incidental discipline groups and one intentional group. Each group was presented with a list of 27 words and their recall was tested later. One group was asked to count the letters in all(prenominal) word one group had to ascertain each word and think of a word that rhymed with it. Neither of these two groups was told that they would later subscribe to to recall these words. Finally, the intentional learning group was asked to read through the list and memorize it for later recall.The aims of this involve are to privyvass whether different learning or age groups have an effect on recall ability and whether there is an interaction between the two groups (age and learning). You must use appropriate ANOVA techniques to investigate and interpret the given information and to complete the tasks given on the following page.From the table above, it is evident that the young are able to recall many words than the old. The young can recall some 11 words with a monetary standard deviation of 6.077 while the old can recall some 8 words with a standard deviation of 2.5. The ability to recall among the young people is a opus varying than the recalling ability of the old people.Table 2 Total number of words recalled per Group Level of processingMeanNStd. DeviationCounting6.65201.182Rhyming7.00201.170Intentional15.15204.511Total9.60604.809Intentional group has the highest recalling ability than the other groups. Participants in this group can recall 15 words with a standard deviation of 4.5. Rhyming groups recalls 7 words with a standard deviation of 1.1 while numeration group recalls 7 words with a standard deviation of 1.2. On variation, the intentional group has the most variations in terms of recalling than the other groups. Table 3 Tests of Between-Subjects Effects pedigreeType III Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.Corrected Model1254.6005250.920123.403.000 arrest5529.60015529.6002719.475.000AGE112.0671112.06755.115.000GROUP925.3002462.650227.533.000AGE * GROUP217.2332108.61753.418.000Error109.800542.033Total6894.00060Corrected Total1364.40059R Squared = .920 (Adjusted R Squared = .912) some(prenominal) the age and the group are significant in determining the number of words one can recall at 95% level of significance. Further, age and group have significant interaction with each other. Figure 1From figure 1 above, it is evident that the young had the least ability to recall among the enumerate group than the old age. However, both Rhyming and intentional had the highest recalling capability than the same groups of old the age. Among the old, both counting and rhyming have the same recalling capacity. Table 4 ANOVA of total number of words recalled per mount up Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.Between Groups112.0671112.067