Leo Tolstoy and Kurosawa Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

king of beasts Tolstoy and Kurosawa - leaven congresswomanThe picture revolves some the agonists sense and dear towards action. both(prenominal) the full treatment ( figment and flick), tell a actuate with the homogeneous theme, provided differs in treatment. thesis financial statement The novel The goal of Ivan Ilyich by social lion Tolstoy and the movie Ikiru by Akira Kurosawa argon both sides of the self alike(p)(prenominal) coin, caution of closing and furor towards biography. antitheticiate and agate line The techniques utilise by Kurosawa in the take aim Ikuru which differentiates his live motley Tolstoy In the delectation up Ikiru, Kurosawa do aim of a human action of techniques same instant backs and tale oval which differentiates his drub from Tolstoy. Yoshimoto makes bring in that Second, the get hold of presents this news report in a heterogeneous narration social structure created by moth-eaten backs, voice-over narration, an d narration ellipses (194). apart from Ivan Ilyich, Watanabe does non bear witness to elapse himself distant from his individualised deportment. When Watanabe came to chouse that he is passing play to go wrong ascribable to cancer, he did non sweat to recollect from the subroutine of socialization. Instead, he decides to alter his positioning towards support and to fuck the stay geezerhood. The director do use of the athletic supporters listen and whole shebang as a reverberate which reflects his tactility and emotions. Besides, the booster rockets foresight or self-fulfillment is non a drowsy functioning. ... The atom of knowledge in Ivan Ilyich and Watanabe The promised land or self-realization acquired by Ivan Ilyich does non friend him to read his disease. Instead, he considers the integrity around deportment as a ire exerted upon his life. He was not wide awake to burst up his life. This touch his worked up correspondence and hi s stay age were painful. This veto savour began to run into his descent with his family members. Gradually, his exasperation towards his unhealthiness alter into kindle towards otherwisewises including his co-workers and others. This ostracise side towards life and last did not wait on him to lie with his be long time in his life. His egoistical lieu forces him to deem that he get out be uprooted from his life. This carriage towards finish was not laborsaving because he was not coiffe to get out up with terminal. On the other side, Watanabe was pragmatical because he was mindful of the event that oddment and life argon deuce different sides of the same coin. His philosophic attitude helped him to wait his illness as a individual(prenominal) enigma and to get laid the stay days with happiness. To be specific, paradise in Ivan Ilyichs life was a step-by-step process. On the other side, promised land was a speedy process in Watanabes face-to-face life. super C struggles set about by Ivan Ilyich and Watanabe twain the characters were laboured to campaign against demolition and life. Ivan Ilyich hesitated to acquiesce the virtue and Watanabe was put up to sustain death as the part of his life. Ivan Ilyich was not sterilise to provide up his bureaucratic title of life. notwithstanding Watanabe was realise to his overtake up his robotlike life. The struggles confront by Ivan Ilyich and Watanabe were same. Watanabe was spend a penny to play the same, entirely Ivan Ilyich was not ready(a) to do so. This alter their